Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:59:10PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>Jiri,
>
>This is getting exhausting, seriously.
>I posted the code you are commenting one two days ago so i dont have to
>repost.

And I commented on the "*u32 = *u32" thing. But you ignored it. Pardon
me for mentioning that again now :/


>
>On D. Ahern: I dont think we are disagreeing anymore on the need to
>generalize the check. He is saying it should be a helper and I already
>had the validation data; either works. I dont see the gapping need
>to remove the validation data.

DavidA? Your opinion.

Reply via email to