On 05/11/2017 07:23 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:49:45 +0200This actually won't work, see also commit 79adffcd6489 ("bpf, verifier: fix rejection of unaligned access checks for map_value_adj") with some longer explanation. In case of map_value_adj, reg->id is always 0.I see.... Ok if I merge in the first 5 patches then?
Yes, please. :)
I'll look more deeply into the MAP value issues.
Ok, thanks for looking into it!