On 05/11/2017 07:23 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:49:45 +0200

This actually won't work, see also commit 79adffcd6489 ("bpf,
verifier:
fix rejection of unaligned access checks for map_value_adj") with some
longer explanation. In case of map_value_adj, reg->id is always 0.

I see....

Ok if I merge in the first 5 patches then?

Yes, please. :)

I'll look more deeply into the MAP value issues.

Ok, thanks for looking into it!

Reply via email to