> >Since you are using DSA, you will have DSA tags enabled on frames
> >to/from the switch. This adds an extra 8 byte header in the frame. My
> >guess is, it is this header, not the VLAN tag which is causing you MTU
> >issues.
>
> But it is strange because, as I have said above, we have the same
> configuration working properly on a kernel 4.1 (with OpenWrt), and
> we have the MTU set to 1500.
If you look at sky2.c:
static unsigned sky2_get_rx_threshold(struct sky2_port *sky2)
{
unsigned size;
/* Space needed for frame data + headers rounded up */
size = roundup(sky2->netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN, 8);
/* Stopping point for hardware truncation */
return (size - 8) / sizeof(u32);
}
This is not going to be big enough for a frame with a DSA header.
> >I think this is the first time i've seen sky2 used in a DSA
> >setup. mv643xx or mvneta is generally what is used, when using Marvell
> >chipsets. These drivers are more lenient about MTU, and are happy to
> >pass frames with additional headers.
> >
>
> We use the mv88e6xxx (as our switch is mv88e6176) and it depends on
> DSA driver in the kernel (isn't it?).
That is correct. But i was talking about the Ethernet interface. All
the designs i've seen use an mv643xxx Ethernet interface, or an mvneta
interface. This is the first time i've seen a sky2 used, which is why
i'm not too surprised you have issues.
> >Changing the MTU like this is not a good fix. It will allow you to
> >receive frames which are bigger, but it also means the local network
> >stack will generate bigger frames to be transmitted. You probably need
> >to modify the sky2 driver to allow it to receive frames bigger than
> >the interface MTU, by about 8 bytes.
>
> Should the DSA driver remove the DSA tags before pass the frames to
> sky2 interface?
The DSA driver is adding the DSA tags to the frame and passing these
tagged frames to the sky2 interface. Frames going to/from the switch
will always have such tags.
> >>[ 4901.032989] sky2 0000:04:00.0 marvell: tx timeout
> >>[ 4904.722670] sky2 0000:04:00.0 marvell: Link is up at 1000 Mbps,
> >>full duplex, flow control both
> >
> >Between the sky2 and the switch, do you have two back-to-back PHYs or
> >are you connecting the RGMII interfaces together?
>
> I think that we have two back-to-back PHYs, but I am going to double
> check this with the hardware team.
This could be your problem them. The mv88e6xxx switch driver assumes
there is a straight rgmii-rgmii connection, no PHYs. So it hard
configures the 'CPU' port to its fastest speed, with the link forced
up. If you actually have a PHY there, this might not work so well. I
don't know if the switch PHY is going to do autoneg correctly. Try
using ethtool to look at the sky2 PHY and see what state it is in.
Andrew
