On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:43:03PM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 4/20/17 4:39 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:19 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Fix by checking for the flag and failing with EINVAL. > >> > > > > I am still not sure about this. There are a few unused bits in > > this flag, we simply ignore the rest, right? Why should we > > reject this one instead of all of those we don't use? > > > > RTF_PCPU most definitely should not be set by userspace. +1
- [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not be settable fr... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not be se... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not b... Andrey Konovalov
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not be se... Cong Wang
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not b... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should n... Cong Wang
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU shou... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should n... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: RTF_PCPU should not be se... David Miller