Às 5:17 PM de 3/24/2017, David Miller escreveu: > From: Joao Pinto <joao.pi...@synopsys.com> > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:02:27 +0000 > >> Yes, I agree, it is better to revert and leave the tree functional for all. >> >> @David Miller: >> The multiple-buffer patch introduced some problems in some setups that are >> being >> hard to debug, so Corentin gave the idea of reverting the until >> commit 7bac4e1ec3ca2342929a39638d615c6b672c27a0 (net: stmmac: stmmac >> interrupt >> treatment prepared for multiple queues), which I fully agree. >> >> In my setup is ok, but the idea is to have everyone's setup working :), so >> lets >> break them into smaller pieces, and let's only apply them when everyone >> confirms >> that is working ok in your setups, agree? >> >> What is the typical mechanism for this? I send a patch reverting them? > > If you can compose a single "git revert" command to achieve this, just > tell me what it is and I'll do it. > > Otherwise send a patch that does the revert.
Ok, I sent 2 patches with fixes. Let's see if you get some happy clients. If not, I will inform the commit id to revert. Thanks David. > > Thanks. >
