From: Joao Pinto <joao.pi...@synopsys.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:02:27 +0000
> Yes, I agree, it is better to revert and leave the tree functional for all. > > @David Miller: > The multiple-buffer patch introduced some problems in some setups that are > being > hard to debug, so Corentin gave the idea of reverting the until > commit 7bac4e1ec3ca2342929a39638d615c6b672c27a0 (net: stmmac: stmmac interrupt > treatment prepared for multiple queues), which I fully agree. > > In my setup is ok, but the idea is to have everyone's setup working :), so > lets > break them into smaller pieces, and let's only apply them when everyone > confirms > that is working ok in your setups, agree? > > What is the typical mechanism for this? I send a patch reverting them? If you can compose a single "git revert" command to achieve this, just tell me what it is and I'll do it. Otherwise send a patch that does the revert. Thanks.
