On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 16:13 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote: > Re-schedule napi after napi_complete() for tx, if it is necessay. > > In r8152_poll(), if the tx is completed after tx_bottom() and before > napi_complete(), the scheduling of napi would be lost. Then, no > one handles the next tx until the next napi_schedule() is called. > > Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayesw...@realtek.com> > --- > drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c > index ec882be..45d168e 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c > @@ -1936,6 +1936,9 @@ static int r8152_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int > budget) > napi_complete(napi); > if (!list_empty(&tp->rx_done)) > napi_schedule(napi); > + else if (!skb_queue_empty(&tp->tx_queue) && > + !list_empty(&tp->tx_free)) > + napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
Why using &tp->napi instead of napi here, as done 3 lines above ?
