On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:09:19PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On 01.12.2016 21:54, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:40:48PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > >> On 01.12.2016 21:04, David Miller wrote: > >>> > >>> Hannes and Ido, > >>> > >>> It looks like we are very close to having this in mergable shape, can > >>> you guys work out this final issue and figure out if it really is > >>> a merge stopped or not? > >> > >> Sure, if the fib notification register could be done under protection of > >> the sequence counter I don't see any more problems. > > > > Did you maybe miss my reply yesterday? Because I was trying to > > understand what "ordering" you're referring to, but didn't receive a > > reply from you. > > Oh, strange, I am pretty sure I replied to that. Let me resend it.
:) I did get this reply, and then replied myself here: https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148053017425465&w=2
