On 01.12.2016 21:54, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:40:48PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >> On 01.12.2016 21:04, David Miller wrote: >>> >>> Hannes and Ido, >>> >>> It looks like we are very close to having this in mergable shape, can >>> you guys work out this final issue and figure out if it really is >>> a merge stopped or not? >> >> Sure, if the fib notification register could be done under protection of >> the sequence counter I don't see any more problems. > > Did you maybe miss my reply yesterday? Because I was trying to > understand what "ordering" you're referring to, but didn't receive a > reply from you.
Oh, strange, I am pretty sure I replied to that. Let me resend it. >> The sync handler is nice to have and can be done in a later patch series. > > Sync handler? I was talking about SWITCHDEV_SYNC. Bye, Hannes
