On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:32:30PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:14:41PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:59:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:54:40PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote: > > > > Packets with unknown destination addresses are not forwarded to the cpu > > > > port on mv88e6097 based switches (e.g. MV88E6097) at the moment. This > > > > commit enables PORT_CONTROL_FORWARD_UNKNOWN_MC for this family. > > > > > > Please try adding MV88E6XXX_FLAG_EDSA to > > > MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_FAMILY_6097. That is the better fix if it works. > > > > I was even wondering what EDSA means:) Thanks this solved the problem! > > Great. > > We should fix up a few minor issues and resubmit. > > What is the status of the first patch, which added 6097 to the driver? > I don't think David accepted it yet. So lets make one patchset > containing the two patches. > > The subject line of the patches need to have net-next in it. e.g. > > [PATCH net-next 0/2] Add support for the MV88e6097 > > Include a cover node, saying what the patchset as a whole does. > This gets used as the merge commit message. > > Then the two patches.
Perfect, thanks a lot for the help! The patchset will follow. Thanks Stefan
