On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:14:41PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:59:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:54:40PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> > > Packets with unknown destination addresses are not forwarded to the cpu
> > > port on mv88e6097 based switches (e.g. MV88E6097) at the moment. This
> > > commit enables PORT_CONTROL_FORWARD_UNKNOWN_MC for this family.
> >
> > Please try adding MV88E6XXX_FLAG_EDSA to
> > MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_FAMILY_6097. That is the better fix if it works.
>
> I was even wondering what EDSA means:) Thanks this solved the problem!
Great.
We should fix up a few minor issues and resubmit.
What is the status of the first patch, which added 6097 to the driver?
I don't think David accepted it yet. So lets make one patchset
containing the two patches.
The subject line of the patches need to have net-next in it. e.g.
[PATCH net-next 0/2] Add support for the MV88e6097
Include a cover node, saying what the patchset as a whole does.
This gets used as the merge commit message.
Then the two patches.
When posting the patchset, please start a new thread. A new version of
a patchset or patch should be a new thread.
Thanks
Andrew
