On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:55:42AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Attached are two small patches for include/net/ieee80211.h to prepare for
> later submission of code to implement a user-space daemon that supplies
> 802.11 regulatory information.
>
> The first change adds a bit indicating that 802.11h rules are to be applied
> to a channel. As discussed earlier in this list, a single bit is unlikely
> @@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ #define IEEE80211_52GHZ_CHANNELS (IEEE80
>
> enum {
> IEEE80211_CH_PASSIVE_ONLY = (1 << 0),
> + IEEE80211_CH_80211H_RULES = (1 << 1),
> IEEE80211_CH_B_ONLY = (1 << 2),
> IEEE80211_CH_NO_IBSS = (1 << 3),
> IEEE80211_CH_UNIFORM_SPREADING = (1 << 4),
Any idea why this "hole" was here to begin with? Was there something
else defined as (1 << 1) previously? Is it safe to reuse this value?
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
