Re: [PATCH] Changes to ieee80211.h for user space regulatory daemon

[Larry Finger]

John W. Linville wrote:
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ #define IEEE80211_52GHZ_CHANNELS (IEEE80
 enum {
        IEEE80211_CH_PASSIVE_ONLY = (1 << 0),
+       IEEE80211_CH_80211H_RULES = (1 << 1),
        IEEE80211_CH_B_ONLY = (1 << 2),
        IEEE80211_CH_NO_IBSS = (1 << 3),
        IEEE80211_CH_UNIFORM_SPREADING = (1 << 4),

Any idea why this "hole" was here to begin with?  Was there something
else defined as (1 << 1) previously?  Is it safe to reuse this value?

John

The hole has been there as long as I have been reading the ieee80211 code. If you are not 
comfortable with plugging the hole, then we can use (1 << 5).

Larry

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html