On 9/13/16 10:00 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> wrote: >> RFC patch sent out as http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667892/ . This >> achieves a fair bit of simplification with no or negligible >> performance impact, because there was a lot of redundancy in the >> parameters that were passed in. > > David, any thoughts on that patch? I submitted it as RFC because I > wasn't sure what you wanted. Should I have sent it as non-RFC instead? >
I realize you meant DaveM, but this one has been accepted. It's your other 2 that are marked RFC by you and in patchwork.
