On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> wrote: > RFC patch sent out as http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667892/ . This > achieves a fair bit of simplification with no or negligible > performance impact, because there was a lot of redundancy in the > parameters that were passed in.
David, any thoughts on that patch? I submitted it as RFC because I wasn't sure what you wanted. Should I have sent it as non-RFC instead?
