On 11.07.2016 04:15, Florian Westphal wrote: > Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com> wrote: >> OK with the general idea; However I don't want to abuse IPSKB_FORWARDED >> as the skb is not really "ip forwarded", and it might have undesirable >> affects, such as in 'ip_skb_dst_mtu' which follows. > > I don't see a problem with that. Hannes?
If we segment/fragment along the way we need to use the non-pmtu/interface-mtu, so this change would be correct in regard to the mtu selection. Bye, Hannes