On 11.07.2016 04:15, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com> wrote:
>> OK with the general idea; However I don't want to abuse IPSKB_FORWARDED
>> as the skb is not really "ip forwarded", and it might have undesirable
>> affects, such as in 'ip_skb_dst_mtu' which follows.
> 
> I don't see a problem with that. Hannes?

If we segment/fragment along the way we need to use the
non-pmtu/interface-mtu, so this change would be correct in regard to the
mtu selection.

Bye,
Hannes

Reply via email to