David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com> > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:05:41 +0300 > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:03:27 +0200, f...@strlen.de wrote: > >> (Or did I misunderstand this setup...?) > > > > tap0 bridged with vxlan0. > > route to vxlan0's remote peer is via eth0, configured with small mtu. > > Florian, any more comments?
Sorry, I commented now. But I'd really like to hear what vxlan experts have to say about this, seems in RFC (7348) universe endpoint fragmention is not supposed to happen :-/
