From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 19:16:51 -0700
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:35:18AM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote: >> Does it make sense to backport >> 3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 from 4.6 to the longterm >> (4.4) release? I can trivially recreate the issue represented by >> 3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 by attaching a eBPF filter >> that clones an ingress ICMP packet, and then tries to set the >> destination MAC address. >> >> It seems like the patch applies cleanly to 4.4. I cherry-picked it, >> and rebuilt my kernel, and at least in the trivial test case passes. > > Makes sense to me, especially since it's lts. > Daniel, thoughts? I'll queued this up for 4.4 -stable.
