On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:35:18AM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > Does it make sense to backport > 3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 from 4.6 to the longterm > (4.4) release? I can trivially recreate the issue represented by > 3697649ff29e0f647565eed04b27a7779c646a22 by attaching a eBPF filter > that clones an ingress ICMP packet, and then tries to set the > destination MAC address. > > It seems like the patch applies cleanly to 4.4. I cherry-picked it, > and rebuilt my kernel, and at least in the trivial test case passes.
Makes sense to me, especially since it's lts. Daniel, thoughts?
