On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
That is problematic. Existing apps depend on rtnetlink stats. But if we
don't count offloaded forwarded packets, the apps don't see anything.
Therefore I believe that this patchset approach is better. The existing
apps continue to work and future apps can use newly introduces sw_stats
to query slowpath traffic. Makes sense to me.
I agree with Jiri. It is a bad idea to depend on ethtool for any of
this stuff. Is there a way we can tag netlink stats instead
to indicate they are hardware or software?
We already have a use case with the tc where someone could get/set
hardware and/or software.
cheers,
jamal
