Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:26:32AM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:37:13 +0200
>
>> Until now we had stats functions return SW statistics. However, it makes
>> a lot of sense to return HW stats as default. The existing apps count with
>> having the defaults stats complete, but that is not true now as the offloaded
>> forward traffic is not visible there.
>>
>> If user wants to know real SW stats, this patchset provides way to get
>> it as well.
>
>I think we haven't been very good about defining good rules nor
>guidelines for how to handle HW vs SW stats, and I'm talking
>strictly about what we publish via rtnl_link_stats64.
>
>However, if I were working from scratch on a new driver what I would
>be inclined to do is use HW stats for everything that the chip
>provides direct and accurate support for, and fill in the gaps with SW
>stats.
>
>Because to me, stats are stats, the user wants to know (for example)
>how many broadcast packets have gone through the port and doesn't care
>how you obtain that number.
>
>If the problem being addressed is that drivers aren't reporting
>information on all the packets going through the device, then that's a
>bug.
>
>But it seems to me like mlxsw is already maintaining the software
>statistic counters, so I can't see a performance reason for not
>properly providing all of the statistics using HW vs. SW as is
>appropriate for each and every value to fix this problem. Why
>create an entire new facility just for that? It doesn't seem to
>be needed.
>
>Maybe you just need to describe things a bit more completely in this
>header posting.
The problem we try to handle is different, it's about offloaded
forwarded packets which are not seen by kernel. Let me try to draw it :)
port1 port2 (HW stats are counted here)
\ /
\ /
\ /
--(A)---- ASIC --(B)--
|
(C)
|
CPU (SW stats are counted here)
Now we have couple of flows for TX and RX (direction does not matter here):
1) port1->A->ASIC->C->CPU
For this flow, HW and SW stats are equal.
2) port1->A->ASIC->C->CPU->C->ASIC->B->port2
For this flow, HW and SW stats are equal.
3) port1->A->ASIC->B->port2
For this flow, SW stats are 0.
The purpose of this patchset is to provide facility for user to
find out the difference between flows 1+2 and 3. In other words, user
will be able to see the statistics for his slow-path (through kernel).
Also, as a default the accumulated stats (HW) will be exposed to user
so the userspace apps can react properly.
