On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35:52AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com> wrote: > > > A bit off topic, I feel like the SKBTX_ACK_TSTAMP and txstamp_ack are sort > > of redundant but I have not look into the details yet, so not completely > > sure. It wwould be a separate cleanup patch if it is the case. > > Please read 6b084928baac562ed61866f540a96120e9c9ddb7 changelog ;) > > A cache line miss avoidance is critical I looked at the patch but I probably am missing something :( Is checking txstamp_ack alone enough and SKBTX_ACK_TSTAMP is not needed since they are always set together?
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] tcp: Carry ... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] tcp: Ca... Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] tcp: Carry eor_info in t... Martin KaFai Lau
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 5/7] tcp: Make use of MSG_EOR... Martin KaFai Lau
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/7] tcp: Merge tx_flags/tske... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/7] tcp: Merge tx_f... Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
- [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Merge tx_flags/tske... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Merge tx_f... Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Merge ... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Me... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp... Martin KaFai Lau
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7... Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 2/7] tcp: Me... Soheil Hassas Yeganeh