On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com> wrote:

> A bit off topic, I feel like the SKBTX_ACK_TSTAMP and txstamp_ack are sort
> of redundant but I have not look into the details yet, so not completely
> sure.  It wwould be a separate cleanup patch if it is the case.

Please read 6b084928baac562ed61866f540a96120e9c9ddb7 changelog ;)

A cache line miss avoidance is critical

Reply via email to