On 4/6/2016 8:58 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> > Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:17 -0700 > >> On 4/6/2016 2:20 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> >>> This is a way too large patch series. >>> >>> Please split it up into smaller, more logical, pieces. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> If you apply the 1st 3 that have been acked, I'll be at 13. >> >> Would I then send the next 5 for V4, and when that is applied >> send another V4 with the next 8 that have been already been acked? > > What other reasonable option is there? I can't think of any. >
A V1 for the next 8 would not be too unreasonable.
