From: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:17 -0700
> On 4/6/2016 2:20 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >> This is a way too large patch series. >> >> Please split it up into smaller, more logical, pieces. >> >> Thanks. >> > > If you apply the 1st 3 that have been acked, I'll be at 13. > > Would I then send the next 5 for V4, and when that is applied > send another V4 with the next 8 that have been already been acked? What other reasonable option is there? I can't think of any.
