From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:23:55 -0700
> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 07:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 06:29 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> > Sure, but the caller changed quite a lot in all stable versions. >> > >> > I took the easiest path for stable maintainers, and was planing to >> > implement a better way in net-next. >> >> I misread your suggestion David, I send a V2 shortly. >> > > Actually, I'll wait for net-next opening. > > My brain farted while working on the 'non refcounted TCP listener' > because __inet_lookup_listener() will really need to be called from > enclosed rcu_read_lock(), and for a reason I though net tree had a bug. > > The local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() removal can certainly wait > net-next. > > Sorry for the confusion. Ok, I'll mark this patch as deferred then. Thanks Eric.
