On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 07:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 06:29 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > Sure, but the caller changed quite a lot in all stable versions. > > > > I took the easiest path for stable maintainers, and was planing to > > implement a better way in net-next. > > I misread your suggestion David, I send a V2 shortly. >
Actually, I'll wait for net-next opening. My brain farted while working on the 'non refcounted TCP listener' because __inet_lookup_listener() will really need to be called from enclosed rcu_read_lock(), and for a reason I though net tree had a bug. The local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() removal can certainly wait net-next. Sorry for the confusion.
