Hi Andreas
On 3/16/2016 10:47 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Peppe,
Am 15.03.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Giuseppe CAVALLARO:
On 3/15/2016 1:54 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
The connectivity issue still remains. Kernel log snippet:
[ +0.001117] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: Looking up phy-supply
from device tree
[ +0.000028] rk808 0-001b: Looking up vcc12-supply from device tree
[ +0.000014] vcc_lan: supplied by vcc_io
[ +0.000101] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: clock input or output?
(input).
[ +0.000009] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: TX delay(0x30).
[ +0.000008] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: RX delay(0x10).
[ +0.000014] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: init for RGMII
[ +0.000104] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: clock input from PHY
[ +0.005063] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet: no reset control found
[ +0.000007] stmmac - user ID: 0x10, Synopsys ID: 0x35
[ +0.000002] Ring mode enabled
[ +0.000006] DMA HW capability register supported
[ +0.000000] Normal descriptors
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[ +0.000003] RX Checksum Offload Engine supported (type 2)
[ +0.000002] TX Checksum insertion supported
[ +0.000002] Wake-Up On Lan supported
[ +0.000053] Enable RX Mitigation via HW Watchdog Timer
[ +0.000771] of_get_named_gpiod_flags: can't parse 'snps,reset-gpio'
property of node '/ethernet@ff290000[0]'
[ +0.004250] libphy: stmmac: probed
[ +0.000009] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 0 IRQ POLL (stmmac-0:00) active
[ +0.000005] eth0: PHY ID 001cc915 at 1 IRQ POLL (stmmac-0:01)
As before, reverting "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit
routine" fixes it. My test cases are `ping 192.168.1.1` and `zypper up`.
so on your side, this revert fixes the issue and you do not see any
tx watchdog as Tomeu's raised.
Confirmed, the system ran stable over night. I don't use NFS on that
system myself, having GMAC working only since v2.
I have fixed some problems on top of
"stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit ..." please
see patch attached for net-next.
Indeed, the normal tx descriptors are well filled w/o
"stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit ..."
I wonder if you could try the attachment in order to understand if we
have to actually revert the patch (I ask you to not revert the
patch "stmmac: first frame...").
Works great on top of next-20160314 with i2c plus this series, please
add my Tested-by. Thanks a lot for investigating!
you are welcome, I have just sent the patch
"[PATCH (net-next.git)] stmmac: fix TX normal DESC"
do not hesitate to contact me for further checks
and if I have missed something.
Cheers
peppe
Cheers,
Andreas
