On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:09:32AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -633,7 +643,7 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
> > > >
> > > > np->phys[0] = 1; /* Default setting */
> > > > np->mii_preamble_required++;
> > > > - for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
> > > > + for (phy = 0; phy < 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
> > > > int mii_status = mdio_read(dev, phy, MII_BMSR);
> > > > int phyx = phy & 0x1f;
> > > > if (mii_status != 0xffff && mii_status != 0x0000) {
> > >
> > > (Your PHY is at address 0?) Can you add some debug here to see what
> > > happens in both cases (f.e. print the returned MII_BMSR values for
> > > both 'start at 0' and 'start at 1')? Presumably there's something
> > > about starting at 1 that gets your hardware confused, I'd like to know
> > > what that is..
> >
> > How about if you just ditch that hunk?
>
> Sorry, I should have mentioned: Arnaldo told me (on IRC) that it
> doesn't detect the transceiver without this hunk.
Hmmm...that seems odd. Of course, that is the way I had it before
Jeff told me to change it to probe PHY ID 0 last... :-)
John
--
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
