On Tue, 2005-26-07 at 00:32 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-25 18:22 > > > The code block which uses input_dev is dead, TC_NCLS is never > > > set as of now. Jamal might have use for it though? Generally, > > > tcf_action_exec() may be called on both ingress and egress. > > > > I mentioned the meta action already; the dummy device replacement > > for IMQ also uses it. > > The ematch shouldnt really care about interpretting it - it should just > > classify on it. > > I was referring to the tc_verd & TC_NCLS check in tcf_action_exec() > which uses input_dev in a printk. I assume dave was referring to the > same code part. What is intended usage of TC_NCLS?
Why does the classifier care about "intended use"? It shouldnt bother intepreting what "intended use" is. Am i missing something? cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
