Dear Annie,

You have thrown the cat amongst the pigeons of my mind!

Of course!

All the time I think - what makes Furtherfield/Netbehaviour super-special is this link between what happens in the experiments and conversations between us all here on the list, and in the physical places in the Furtherfield park venues (and on tour).

The work done by our avant-art-tech networks and communities prompts wonderful (I find them wonderful) encounters, activities and conversations with park users, local residents (from every country- perhaps- in the world) and exhibition visitors (local and international).

But I too have had a feeling of un-ease about a disconnect with the conversations that happen here on the list. This list is one of my favourite places, and yet I find it hard to advocate for it, to people who are not already here. Perhaps because email has now acquired toxic associations for many people because of the demands it places on 'immaterial labourers'.

I have a couple of thoughts about what we might do.

Firstly- a Netbehaviour subscriber could volunteer to host, here on the list, any of the following people

 * artists in our upcoming show,
 * a recent student placement student,
 * any member of our regular (overworked) staff-team.

I would invite them to join us as our guest, to talk about their work, contribution and experience with Furtherfield. As a host you would be responsible for making them feel welcome here and helping them (by mailing with them in private) to negotiate conversations if they were to get spikey: )

Secondly

If there is an appetite amongst netbehaviourists for more sharing of Furtherfield process, it would be easy (and pleasurable, and useful, and actually quite a relief) to open up and share some of the things happening 'on the ground'. As long as people could tolerate incompleteness (we have to take care not invade the privacy of collaborators and partners), contradiction (I have an unruly mind), and the occasional indefensible statement (we work it out as we go) along the way.

To give you a taste of what kinds of topics these might touch on let me start with a brain dump of the possible [Netbehaviour] Subject Headers about Furtherfield process.

 * DAOWO preparation excitement!
     o see here http://www.furtherfield.org/artdatamoney/debate/

 * Reflections on attempting to maintain critical and politically
   astute art processes - without being po-faced and elitist.

 * Installing work by [insert the names here of every artist in
   Furtherfield's upcoming exhibition The Human Face of Cryptoeconomies
   http://bit.ly/1VrLivJ ] at Furtherfield Gallery.

 * Calculations, tactics and strategies for dealing with Furtherfield
   finances
     o Talking to businesspeople (lots of odd feelings!) and how Jeremy
       Corbyn is helping

 * Summer at the Museum of Contemporary Commodities - open
   participatory process - an extreme sport.
     o pictures here
       https://www.flickr.com/photos/http_gallery/sets/72157656437894006

 * Why Furtherfield Commons has had no landline for 3 months
     o (How BT handed over our line to another service provider without
       our agreement and then wouldn't get it back)

 * Preparations for an upcoming street programme 'The People's Magna
   Carta' at Frequency Festival in Lincoln.

 * The Furtherfield website - opening up to noobs and improving
   diversity of participants
     o 7 placement students make themselves heard (it's all a bit tricky!)

 * Seeds of a plan for an experimental innovation lab for values based
   economies
     o The Oslo Innovation Manual (apparently the role of arts, design
       and culture go unaccounted for)

 * How blockchain is redolent with the decentralised distributed
   promise of the early web
     o How we're not falling for the utopian promise of blockchain -
       but skippy with excitement nevertheless!

 * What 7 placement students said about their Summers with Furtherfield

 * How we are thinking about expanding outward and upward (and inward)
   at the gallery/lab in the park and

Finally...

Thanks to Geert (see subject header) for carrying out this in depth experiment with the Netbehaviour subscribers; )
and to Annie for investigating the cause of that sourness; )


What do you reckon???
Tell us, we'll do something!!!

respect due!
Ruth

On 30/09/15 22:11, Annie Abrahams wrote:
hi Randall,

I am not necesarrily asking for more, better media, for more livelyness, I am not sure I want more ... I would like a content re-de-placement, more of the processes going on (artistic and organisational) and les about results and "look what I have done" I would like that there would be more slowness, more attention, more time for open reflexion on what has been done, less representation and for now i see that still more in the mailinglist than on the social media. I think we should reinvent reinvest mailinglists! Netbehaviour first of all.

see you
Annie

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Randall Packer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I’m not sure where to set into this thread, which has become
    multi-threaded in all sorts of interesting directions.

    Regarding Geert: without going into a complete analysis, it’s not
    clear to me that he is aware of the many museums in the US and the
    around the world that are employing social media and what is
    called “user-generated content” in all sorts of compelling ways
    that invite engagement and social change. I have taught courses in
    the Johns Hopkins University Museum Studies program where the
    students are deeply involved with museum-based social and “visitor
    engagement,” to use another museum term. I believe the interview
    does have a few absolutes that have not been thoroughly
    researched, although I have the utmost respect for Geert and his
    critique of corporate-based social media: it’s just not fair to
    museums that are making striking progress, and of course the many
    alternative arts organizations, maker-faires, and hack-a-thons
    around the world that are incorporating socially-based forms of
    art and science.

    Regarding Annie’s concern for place: I agree, we need the means of
    interaction that while remote, give us a more real-time, visual,
    media-rich form of interaction and engagement. I enjoy the ease
    and simplicity of an email list, but there are times you want to
    see faces, hear voices, trade gestures, communicate with sound,
    all of which is near impossible in this medium as a live
    experience. There is no replacing the live: we need to embed the
    real-time into our networked interactions, which for many of us
    here has been at the heart of our artistic work and research. We
    are all nodes on a network, and we need to find ways to engage
    forms of live connectivity that are as easy as sending an email.

    Randall
    From: <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Annie
    Abrahams
    Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
    Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:55 AM
    To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
    Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] An interview with Geert Lovink

    I have been to a shop to buy some coffee beans and while riding my
    bike, I thought : wasn't I a bit nasty to
    furtherfield/netbehaviour? When back I found some reactions that
    reassured me, but
    I had been thinking that somehow I was a bit sour on
    furtherfield/netbehaviour and I asked myself why, what would you
    like to be different, to change?
    A small idea popped up : I miss the connexion between furtherfield
    live in the park (where I imagine a lot of the work is happening)
    and furtherfield online - especially netbehaviour. Of course there
    are the announcements, info on the works showed of people I know
    online, but I miss thoughts by these actual artists who showed,
    worked with the real place on what is going on, on how the
    relation is constructed, of what their work does when place in a
    gallery place. I miss personal stories on this on netbehaviour.

    xxx
    Annie

    On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Pall Thayer <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Fascinating read. On gallery and museum embrace of
        post-internet art, I think there are two things going on.
        First of all, it's new and it's acceptance in galleries and
        museums is probably not much greater than internet art's
        acceptance was when it was new. Second of all, most of it
        takes forms which galleries and museums are familiar with,
        i.e. physical objects, prints, videos, etc. This is a far more
        attractive fit for commercial art galleries and doesn't pose
        any significant archiving issues for museums. At least, not
        ones that they haven't encountered before.

        Pall

        On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:26 AM marc garrett
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hi Paul, Dave, Annie & all,

            Regarding Geert's interview -- I actually agree with most
            of what he says. In fact, I tend to agree with most of his
            ideas and writings.

            I think as a group, we're in tune (usually coincidentally
            with his reflections) but, living through them within a
            grounded context, which is of our everyday life experience
            and as part of surviving as an artist led group in a
            neoliberalist dominated culture.

            The audience he's talking to is an e-flux audience, and I
            think e-flux are part of an neoliberalist, elite
            establishment, so it's positive he is discussing these
            issues to its audience.

            Although, Paul has mentioned already things have been
            getting better and there is evidence of things gettign
            better. I would say that's true in some ways, but it may
            also be true that some of us have got older and into power
            and so able to support media art and net art more these
            days. And before this was not the case ;-)

            Wishing you well.


            marc


            On 30 September 2015 at 14:07, Paul Hertz
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Well, happy to post polemics, it's a kind of a hobby.
                :^}.

                I think there has been a tendency for mainstream
                curators to approach more recent digitally-mediated
                works as if they were in effect a sort of hybrid old
                media, while still neglecting both historical and
                current "pure" digital media. This has meant that
                certain kinds of digital hard copy (modded
                photographic prints, collage and drawings, and even 3D
                printing == "post-digital") can be welcomed while the
                internet as a platform is generally ignored. I don't
                have any more evidence for this than observation, and
                I have felt that the situation for digital art was
                improving over the last ten years. OTOH, I can readily
                understand the impatience.

                -- Paul



                On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:56 AM, dave miller
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                    I think Geert is probably correct though - seems
                    to me the art "establishment" aren't interested in
                    internet/ digital art, though maybe they have a
                    different view of it from us on here.  The art
                    world remains a mystery to me, so I may well be
                    wrong. Thank god for Furtherfield, and I would
                    love to know who are the curators 'not' scared of it.

                    What's the ‘post-digital’ bandwagon?

                    Dave

                    On 30 September 2015 at 13:48, Annie Abrahams
                    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                    wrote:

                        don't be small, don't think sectarism
                        Geert is closer to "us" than most "others"
                        get in contact with him, explain and connect,
                        use his critical energy

                        invite him to curate, to build, to discuss

                        xxx
                        Annie

                        On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:40 PM, NIKOS V
                        <[email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                            I see the relevance in this approach,
                            allthough  I have to say its allready to
                            late for that criticism no?

                            Moreover, is he really interested in art?

                            If yes, as Marc says, where are the
                            references and the names ?

                            And why is Venice Biennial important?To
                            whom????

                            2015-09-30 15:36 GMT+03:00 marc.garrett
                            <[email protected]
                            <mailto:[email protected]>>:

                                Hi Paul,

                                Geert needs to be more specific and
                                highlight the curators who are 'not'
                                scared and who have been showing
                                technical artwork such as Furtherifeld
                                & others - his words are not grounded
                                and are too absolute, they do not
                                reflect reality...

                                marc
                                
http://conversations.e-flux.com/t/geert-lovink-on-social-media-and-the-arts/2581


                                "The absence at the 2015 Venice
                                Bienale of digital arts and internet
                                works says it all. Curators are
                                afraid to admit they are clueless and
                                continue their ignorant attitude
                                towards art that deals with the
                                digital in a direct matter (while
                                checking their smart phone). Everyone
                                jumps on the ‘post-digital’ bandwagon
                                because that’s cute and safe. [...]
                                Curators and critics are more than
                                happy to embrace the race, gender,
                                even the anthroposcene (whatever that
                                is), but are blind for the
                                techno-politics of the equipment and
                                media they are using themselves so
                                intensely. The contradictions are
                                becoming absurd. Video was the last
                                technology they had to deal with, but
                                then it stopped."
                                — Geert Lovink

                                //

                                enjoy,

                                -- Paul


-- -----
                                |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| ---
                                http://paulhertz.net/


                                _______________________________________________
                                NetBehaviour mailing list
                                [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


                                _______________________________________________
                                NetBehaviour mailing list
                                [email protected]
                                <mailto:[email protected]>
                                
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--

                            _______________________________________________
                            NetBehaviour mailing list
                            [email protected]
                            <mailto:[email protected]>
                            
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--
                        *26 09 14h* /vivre entre – from estranger to
                        e-stranger/, une *conférence performée
                        festival Magdalena, * La Bulle Bleue
                        <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject>,
                        285 rue du Mas de Prunet, Montpellier
                        
aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/
                        
<https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/>/*
                        */

                        /*besides, *
                        /online performances *On Object Agency *
                        with Martina Ruhsam
                        *archives* (text, script, video, images)*/
                        /*bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/>

                        *Marc Garrett* interviewed me for the *Choose
                        Your Muse* series on *Furtherfield*
                        
furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams
                        
<http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams>


                        */
                        /*


                        _______________________________________________
                        NetBehaviour mailing list
                        [email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>
                        
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



                    _______________________________________________
                    NetBehaviour mailing list
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>
                    http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




-- ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| ---
                http://paulhertz.net/

                _______________________________________________
                NetBehaviour mailing list
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


            _______________________________________________
            NetBehaviour mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

-- P Thayer, Artist
        http://pallthayer.dyndns.org

        _______________________________________________
        NetBehaviour mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--
    *26 09 14h* /vivre entre – from estranger to e-stranger/, une
    *conférence performée
    festival Magdalena, * La Bulle Bleue
    <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject>, 285 rue du Mas
    de Prunet, Montpellier
    aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/
    
<https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/>/*
    */

    /*besides, *
    /online performances *On Object Agency *
    with Martina Ruhsam
    *archives* (text, script, video, images)*/
    /*bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/>

    *Marc Garrett* interviewed me for the *Choose Your Muse* series on
    *Furtherfield*
    
furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams
    
<http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams>


    */
    /*

    _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour
    mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

    _______________________________________________
    NetBehaviour mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--

*26 09 14h* /vivre entre – from estranger to e-stranger/, une *conférence performée festival Magdalena, * La Bulle Bleue <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject>, 285 rue du Mas de Prunet, Montpellier aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/ <https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/>/*
*/

/*besides, *
/online performances *On Object Agency *
with Martina Ruhsam
*archives* (text, script, video, images)*/
/*bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/>

*Marc Garrett* interviewed me for the *Choose Your Muse* series on *Furtherfield* furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams <http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams>

*/
/*



_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


--
Co-founder Co-director
Furtherfield

www.furtherfield.org

+44 (0) 77370 02879
Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce
Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i

Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows, labs, & debates
around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997

Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee
registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.
Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand Arcade, Tally Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to