On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:12:49 GMT, EunHyunsu <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I know this is pre-existing logic but would it be hard to use `java.time` 
>> APIs instead of `Calendar`?
>> Could that method return an `Instant` instead of a `Calendar`?
>
> I looked into it, but `DateTimeFormatter` performs a day-of-week cross-check 
> that `SimpleDateFormat` silently ignores, which would change observable 
> parsing behavior and affect existing tests. 
> 
> I think the migration would be cleaner as a separate follow-up PR. Would that 
> be acceptable?

Yes. What prompted my suggestion is the use of Calendar being split-out in two 
methods now rather than being confined to a single one.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30341#discussion_r3000233567

Reply via email to