Hi, Honestly I wouldn't really see a problem with using the same syntax for the <csc/> task and that is one of the reasons this thread started :-).
In any case that makes 2 for option 2 and if I stop sitting on the fence, 2 for option 3. We need a tie breaker. Clayton > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: March 17, 2004 1:45 AM > To: Jaroslaw Kowalski > Cc: Clayton Harbour; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] CVS update > > > I'd have to say 2 also. Forcing users to use the nested > <globaloptions> > and <commandoptions> for even the simplest actions seems way too > verbose. Imagine if you had to do > <csc> > <commandoptions> > <option name="foo" value="true"/> > <option name="bar" value="true"/> > </commandoptions> > > to compile using csc ? > > Ian > > > Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > > >My vote is 2 (but make sure that "extraoptions" is needed in <5% > >cases). > > > >Jarek > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin Dickover" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Scott > >Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:55 AM > >Subject: RE: [Nant-users] CVS update > > > > > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>-1000 for the framework idea :-). Okay I am going to try to put my > >>bruised ego aside and pull something constructive from this :-). > >> > >>Framework aside for now the issue is: what syntax do you prefer: > >> > >>1) option collections (current): > >><cvs-update globaloptions="-nt" > >>commandoptions="-r VERSION_FOO" ...... > > >><globaloptions> > >><option name="readonly" value="true"/> > >></globaloptions> > >><commandoptions> > >><option name="pergeempty" > >>value="false"/> > >><option name="newdirs" value="false"/> > >></commandoptions> > >><fileset> > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > >></fileset> > >></cvs-update> > >> > >>2) attributes: > >><cvs-update purgeempty="true" > >>newdirs="false" > >>overwritelocal="true" > >>extraoptions="-D ..."> > >><fileset> > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > >></fileset> > >></cvs-update> > >> > >>3) nested commands with attributes: > >><cvs cvsroot="{$CVSROOT}" rootprefix="{$CVSROOTPREFIX}" > >>readonly="true"> <update pruneEmpty="true" > >>buildDirectories="true" recursive="true"> > >><fileset> > >><includes name="**/*.cs"/> > >></fileset> > >></update> > >></cvs> > >> > >>4) I don't care, just quit spamming my mailbox and tell me when you > >>are done. > >> > >> > >>My vote is either for 1 or 3. Please let me know what your > preference > >>is, if you have one. > >> > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >> > >>Clayton > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President > and CEO of > >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > >_______________________________________________ > >Nant-users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users > > > > > > > -- > Ian MacLean, Developer, > ActiveState, a division of Sophos > http://www.ActiveState.com > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
