My vote is 2 (but make sure that "extraoptions" is needed in <5% cases).
Jarek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin Dickover"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Scott
Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:55 AM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] CVS update
> Hi,
>
> -1000 for the framework idea :-). Okay I am going to try to put my
> bruised ego aside and pull something constructive from this :-).
>
> Framework aside for now the issue is: what syntax do you prefer:
>
> 1) option collections (current):
> <cvs-update globaloptions="-nt"
> commandoptions="-r VERSION_FOO" ...... >
> <globaloptions>
> <option name="readonly" value="true"/>
> </globaloptions>
> <commandoptions>
> <option name="pergeempty"
> value="false"/>
> <option name="newdirs" value="false"/>
> </commandoptions>
> <fileset>
> <includes name="**/*.cs"/>
> </fileset>
> </cvs-update>
>
> 2) attributes:
> <cvs-update purgeempty="true"
> newdirs="false"
> overwritelocal="true"
> extraoptions="-D ...">
> <fileset>
> <includes name="**/*.cs"/>
> </fileset>
> </cvs-update>
>
> 3) nested commands with attributes:
> <cvs cvsroot="{$CVSROOT}" rootprefix="{$CVSROOTPREFIX}"
> readonly="true">
> <update pruneEmpty="true"
> buildDirectories="true" recursive="true">
> <fileset>
> <includes name="**/*.cs"/>
> </fileset>
> </update>
> </cvs>
>
> 4) I don't care, just quit spamming my mailbox and tell me when
> you are done.
>
>
> My vote is either for 1 or 3. Please let me know what your preference
> is, if you have one.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Clayton
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
