On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 11:50:01AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-07 09:07:23 +0000, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > This is all very well but it's a bit unlikely that every other
> > MUA in the world is going to get fixed just to satisfy mutt
> > users.
>
> We're not talking aobut satisfying mutt users, but about
> implementing specifications which are on the Standards Track.
>
Yes, I know that, but realistically are the rest of the world's MUAs
going to become PGP/MIME conformant - ever?
> > Personally I find PGP and MIME messages a pain anyway, even
> > though I do use mutt. I have mutt set up on four different
> > systems and getting PGP/MIME working on all four is just not
> > worth the hassle.
>
> Could you please elaborate which problems you are observing? Setting
> up mutt to work with PGP/MIME should be straight-forward.
>
The problems are not so much with mutt itself but with the
infrastructure that has to be in place on the systems where it runs. I
don't own the systems (well I own one of them) so I can't dictate
whether PGP and/or MIME programs are available.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
