On 9/27/11 4:07 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 26.09.2011 23:09, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >> On 9/5/11 8:33 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> We're also asked about timeouts on rooms, too, from time to time. >> >> That strikes me as a potentially useful feature. > > That would be more something like a destroy-on-idle-for-n-hours room > configure option which I think could solve many problems. I assume every > MUC where everyone can create a room has to implement such an option in > one way or another to get rid of abandoned rooms. So I think too it > would be a good thing if clients could read such a (per XEP) > standardized option, even if it might be read-only.
Well, actually I think this is just an implementation-specific feature (in essence, garbage collection for unused rooms). I am slightly less convinced about "I want a chatroom until Time T". Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
