On 2/2/10 10:33 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> 2010/2/2 Jiří Zárevúcky <[email protected]>:
>> Well, I was counting on the fact that the numerical codes should be
>> deprecated and eventually removed, in which case <status/> just as a
>> wrapper with no more informational or functional value would look a bit
>> strange.
> 
> Right, I was thinking MUC was Final so we couldn't make this change,
> but it's Draft. If we've got a clear aim to deprecate status codes in
> favour of the elements, we could probably get away with splitting
> them, but it's not at all clear to me that we can do that in XEP-0045.
> We /could/ do that in XEP-0045bis, if we want to write such a thing,
> though. For the moment, I think including within the status is best.

We can wait to move XEP-0045 forward to Final until the changes in
progress have settled for a while. At that point it will have set a
pretty impressive record for the XEP longest in Draft status. It's been
Draft since 2002-11-21!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to