On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > The question is: should the new child elements be qualified by a > namespace other than muc#user? I think that would be cleaner and less > likely to cause problems, because XMPP implementations ignore data from > unknown namespaces.
I think we should should new namespace it, at this point. > So I propose this: > > <presence > from='[email protected]/thirdwitch' > to='[email protected]/pda'> > <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'> > <item affiliation='member' role='participant'/> > <status code='110'> > <self-presence xmlns='urn:xmpp:muc-status:0'/> > <status> > </x> > </presence> Oh thank goodness! /K
