In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham wrote: > Michael Lefevre wrote: > >> it might be better to check for the well-known build ids > > We rejected that idea when we last revised the nag. We wanted a system > which was less work to keep updated, not more :-)
In which case, the other part my previous post - "there's no way of distinguishing release builds from nightlies" - applies. AFAICS, the options are a) use build ids b) fail to nag 1.4 branch nightly / release candidates c) nag 1.4 final release users You seem to have rejected a) and b), so the remaining option is to stay as we are. I think b) would be a better option personally (and obviously Daniel did too) -- Michael
