> * I don't think we want a low barrier to entry. We want documentation > to be written by people who know what they're talking about, namely, > the developers. The developers know how to use CVS, so it's one > fewer thing to learn.
"The developers" have had several years to produce decent documentation for Mozilla. With a couple of shining exceptions, it hasn't worked. The current website is a complete disaster in terms of finding what you want (good way to tell: people use Google to search it rather than attempt to use our navigation.) This is not a point in Zope vs. CVS - it's merely an observation. The current system of producing documentation does not work. What do you suggest? > * What kind of discussion do you want? How would it be useful? See later replies; I also believe that an annotative model for pages leads to documents which are far more useful, with less effort on the part of the author (because he doesn't need to update them so often.) Gerv
