David Baron wrote: > Let me restate that: I don't think we want what you define to be a low > barrier to entry. I think cvs has a lower barrier to entry than Zope > for the people who we most want to be writing documentation. > > -David
And let me make one thing clear: I personally DO NOT CARE whether we use ZOPE for our documentation base or CVS. There are good reasons for both. I like CVS for the same reasons a lot of people like it: it's proven to work. (By the way, I don't have CVS access.) That's why I see using ZOPE for a catalog is a good compromise: it gives us the metadata we want, but we can still host our docs via CVS on the main mozilla.org server. I think I'll start a spinoff newsthread for us to decide what we want to use ZOPE for.
