On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We're probably too conservative with mda errors but I would rather see > tempfail/permfail solved by sysexits(3) than by substring of the error > message :-/ > Actually, I was thinking after I sent this that exit 555, or some number, would be far better than an arbitrary prefix string. This way we don't invent new standards and behaviors. That's also what exit codes are for. I'll re code this and send a new patch. > Can you explain what use-case you're trying to solve ? Rejecting certain types of messages (sort of spam but not quite) without even accepting the envelopes to begin with. The "accept / send error response" dance is too heavy. -- You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list: [email protected] To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
