Here's my top posting!

load averages:  0.32,  0.16,  0.10    15:39:59
26 processes:  25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states:  1.9% user,  0.0% nice,  0.3% system,  6.2% interrupt, 91.5%
idle
Memory: Real: 128M/338M act/tot  Free: 662M  Swap: 0K/2052M used/tot

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    WAIT      TIME    CPU COMMAND
27303 _isakmpd   2    0 3016K 2900K sleep    select  229:09  0.00% isakmpd
 6143 _snmpd     2    0   20M   20M sleep    kqread  113:47  0.00% snmpd
15473 _bgpd      2    0   77M   78M sleep    poll     86:06  0.00% bgpd
10090 _syslogd   2    0  540K  716K sleep    poll     10:32  0.00% syslogd
 3107 root       2    0  568K 1256K sleep    select    9:07  0.00% sshd
18607 _bgpd      2    0 1756K 2000K sleep    poll      5:07  0.00% bgpd
 3093 root       2    0  992K 1844K sleep    select    2:22  0.00% sendmail
  592 root       2    0   20M   21M sleep    poll      3:06  0.00% bgpd
 9295 root       2    0  488K  792K idle     select    0:00  0.00% cron
   42 root       2    0  464K  748K idle     select    0:50  0.00% inetd
    1 root      10    0  428K  324K idle     wait      0:29  0.00% init
13536 _ntp       2    0  512K  796K idle     poll      0:00  0.00% ntpd
 1405 root       2    0  712K  716K idle     netio     0:02  0.00% syslogd
28634 root       2    0  420K  708K sleep    netio     0:00  0.00% comsat
  738 root       2    0  516K  732K idle     poll      0:00  0.00% ntpd
27740 root       2    0 3372K 2608K sleep    select    0:00  0.00% sshd
21831 root       2    0 1288K  584K idle     netio     0:00  0.00% isakmpd
10319 root      18    0  496K  444K sleep    pause     0:00  0.00% ksh


On 31 March 2010 16:12, Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK <
[email protected]> wrote:

> > Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > > Oh hai!
> > >
> >
> > Marco does it for the lulz.
> > > You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
> > > you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
> > >>>> http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-30000,0
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >> I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
> > >> obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
> > >> mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
> > >> sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
> > >>
> > >> I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
> > >> behavior is okay . . .?
> > >>
> > >> Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
> > >> apparent need/desire to top post.
> > >>
> > >> Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
> > >> now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
> > >> appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
> > >> annoying (to say the least).
>
>
> Damn it, people, when I want to have the top-posting debate I'll have it
> with my brother.
>
> --
> Ed Ahlsen-Girard
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature
> which had a name of smime.p7s]

Reply via email to