> Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Oh hai! > > > > Marco does it for the lulz. > > You know you don't have to read what I write you know. If it irritates > > you that is your problem, not mine. Feel free to ignore this. > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> oooh that looks perfect; let me try that. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored. > >>>>> > >>>> webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like > >>>> http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-30000,0 > >>>> > >>> > >> I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the > >> obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if > >> mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm > >> sure he has and that's why he does it ;-). > >> > >> I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list > >> behavior is okay . . .? > >> > >> Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his > >> apparent need/desire to top post. > >> > >> Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from > >> now on? misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us > >> appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is . . . well . . . > >> annoying (to say the least).
Damn it, people, when I want to have the top-posting debate I'll have it with my brother. -- Ed Ahlsen-Girard [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
