On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So what does it mean for a single byte write to be atomic?
>
> That some bits in a byte won't be updated without other bits being
> updated as well.

Considering how much extra work a filesystem would have to go through
to enable that to be untrue, it seems silly to call it out as
something special.

Reply via email to