On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:09:03PM -0500, nixlists wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Denis Doroshenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/14/10, nixlists <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does it have the same reliability features as qmail on an FS without > >> softupdates? What about with softupdates? > >> > >> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html > > > > the very link you just provided contains the following sentence: > > > > Do not use async or softupdates filesystems. > > > Sorry, forget I mentioned softupdates. Does it do what qmail does? > Reliaibility-wise? > > "qmail's queue, except for bounce message contents, is crashproof on > the BSD FFS and most of its variants. "
Nothing is crash prof. Can you please stop making these retarded statements? You are making a fool of yourself. If software people weren't so dangerous they'd be adorable.
