On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:03:31PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:40:13AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that > > > Don't you think theo has the best interest of the project as his first > > priority? > > best interest: yes.
So why do you think he would bring such a sensitive issue up to the community? An issue that really would have been better handled behind the scenes of the public but unfortunately can't. > best attitude and people skills: i am not so sure... What in the world do people skills have to do with anything. This is a mathematical problem. A == B is what it should be however A < B so there is an issue. Calling someone something isn't nice. > > all i am saying is that the other side still hasn't spoken up. No need to. > i am sure it's more than easy to go through the papers > and show where my money went and see who is right. Theo explained it in a pretty detailed email. Money that was supposed to roll into OpenBSD didn't and someone is responsible for that. What more information do you need? It is a pretty simple case. > that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project. Why? code is open; finances are not. This is simply the way it is. OpenBSD is not a 503.c and therefore it is decided by its highest authority on what is public and what is not. No need to make an extremely unfortunate situation worse by throwing opinion, rumors and good ol' made up stuff onto the fire. > -f > -- > artificial intelligence: the other guy's opinion. It sure is!
