frantisek holop wrote: > > that is all i am asking. more transparency in this open project.
Whilst transparency is a good thing, and the project is known for its open stance, surely in this particular case it would be imprudent for us to comment further until the parties directly involved have resolved things? Perhaps the matter will be resolved, and relations between kd85 and OpenBSD will return to their once rosy state. Perhaps negotiations will break down, and another reseller will be sought. Perhaps legal proceedings will occur in some form. All are possible. Nothing we can say or do can possibly improve matters, and indeed could well do harm. Whilst openness is always to be encouraged, sometimes discretion is necessary, especially in matters of business disputes. I do not doubt that once things have been resolved one way or another, there will be a report for those who care, by those who are in a position to provide authoritative answers. In the meantime, it is down to us to be patient, mature and understanding, and allow those involved to resolve things without us breathing down their necks. I am no developer, no distributor, just a happy user from Britain who hopes he will see his already-paid-for 4.5 set some time soon. My hope, for what its worth, is that we let this thread die until someone with the facts can properly draw a line under it. Peace. Si1entDave
