"j3s" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote:
>> I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
>> insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
>> proprietary software.
>
> this is crap.
That stuff sure shares a lot of traits w/ one's typical proprietary
product: fluffy obscurity, bugginess, ridiculous design flaws, lack of
plain common sense, etc.
>> unix philosphy should have been kept in linux. Because it wasn't,
>> well... Linux and GNU for that matter are going to take a hit again and
>> again, till they learn their damn lessons.
>
> GNU isn't a collective of children to be punished. They're programmers
> volunteering their time and you sound like a sad person for treating
> them this way.
,s/programmers/advocates/
> But also, Theo is right, none of this relates to OpenBSD;
Doesn't it, really? Comparison w/ the outside world is on of the most
useful critical tools that me's aware of.
> it seems like
> you just want a pedestal to piss on others from. This is not that place.
Medidn't observe zap do that (at least not yet).
--zeurkous.
P.S. to zap: the courtesy copy of the prev msg got rejected by your
mail swerver; either you do not exist (as it claims), or volny is
fscking up somehow. Either way, consider yourself informed.
--
Friggin' Machines!
