Haai,
"zap" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
As meobserved, Theo's agression is more of passive kind. Dunno if that's
an improvement...
> but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
> pointless things like redhat's crap, systemd for example, he seems to
> prefer the keep it simple stupid approach from what I have seen. I much
> prefer security over complexity.
No argument from me there.
> I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
> insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
> proprietary software.
Me first question is always: if it breaks, can me feasibly fix it? Only
if so, me's satisfied (that still means that most of BSD fails the
test, but it ain't exactly a perfect world... it has humans in it, after
all).
> unix philosphy should have been kept in linux. Because it wasn't,
> well... Linux and GNU for that matter are going to take a hit again and
> again, till they learn their damn lessons.
Learn their lessons? They won't. Just like Theo won't (me'll be glad to
be proven wrong).
> Very few linux people have learned this lesson. Hyperbola is the only
> one I know of that realizes linux is a dead end. I would hope you guys
> would feel honored by this fact, but oh well.
No, he's not the only one. But UNIX has become a dead end as well (me'll
spare you that rant), for different reasons.
> Either way, I do have respect for you guys. Even if you don't realize it.
Mehasn't doubted that.
--zeurkous.
--
Friggin' Machines!
